You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Raising root zone temperature improves plant productivity and metabolites in hydroponic lettuce production
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1352331 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sota Hayashi, Christopher P. Levine, Wakabayashi Yu, Mayumi Usui, Atsuyuki Yukawa, Yoshihiro Ohmori, Miyako Kusano, Makoto Kobayashi, Tomoko Nishizawa, Ikusaburo Kurimoto, Saneyuki Kawabata, Wataru Yamori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,865,725
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#651
of 24,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,020
of 148,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.