You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Leveraging the sugarcane CRISPR/Cas9 technique for genetic improvement of non-cultivated grasses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1369416 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chunjia Li, Muhammad Aamir Iqbal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,093,372
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,022
of 24,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,009
of 291,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#72
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.