↓ Skip to main content

Combining features selection strategy and features fusion strategy for SPAD estimation of winter wheat based on UAV multispectral imagery

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining features selection strategy and features fusion strategy for SPAD estimation of winter wheat based on UAV multispectral imagery
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2024.1404238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangxiang Su, Ying Nian, Hiba Shaghaleh, Amar Hamad, Hu Yue, Yongji Zhu, Jun Li, Weiqiang Wang, Hong Wang, Qiang Ma, Jikai Liu, Xinwei Li, Yousef Alhaj Hamoud

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,655,957
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,084
of 24,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,280
of 149,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#46
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,954 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.