↓ Skip to main content

Efficiently recording and processing data from arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization assays using AMScorer and AMReader

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficiently recording and processing data from arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization assays using AMScorer and AMReader
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2024.1405598
Authors

Edwin Jarratt-Barnham, Giles E. D. Oldroyd, Jeongmin Choi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#16,417,678
of 25,922,020 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,811
of 24,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,199
of 144,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#32
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,922,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,966 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.