You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Trends and perspectives for the use of crop wild relatives in crop breeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1424160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rodomiro Ortiz, Filippo M. Bassi, Mahesh Rao, Diego Rubiales |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,836,153
of 26,058,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,940
of 24,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,366
of 184,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,058,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.