↓ Skip to main content

Independence and Interdependence Predict Health and Wellbeing: Divergent Patterns in the United States and Japan

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Independence and Interdependence Predict Health and Wellbeing: Divergent Patterns in the United States and Japan
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinobu Kitayama, Mayumi Karasawa, Katherine B. Curhan, Carol D. Ryff, Hazel Rose Markus

Abstract

A cross-cultural survey was used to examine two hypotheses designed to link culture to wellbeing and health. The first hypothesis states that people are motivated toward prevalent cultural mandates of either independence (personal control) in the United States or interdependence (relational harmony) in Japan. As predicted, Americans with compromised personal control and Japanese with strained relationships reported high perceived constraint. The second hypothesis holds that people achieve wellbeing and health through actualizing the respective cultural mandates in their modes of being. As predicted, the strongest predictor of wellbeing and health was personal control in the United States, but the absence of relational strain in Japan. All analyses controlled for age, gender, educational attainment, and personality traits. The overall pattern of findings underscores culturally distinct pathways (independent versus interdependent) in achieving the positive life outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 166 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 41 24%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 49%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 41 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,917,632
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,910
of 34,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,521
of 178,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#16
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.