You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reinhold Kliegl, Ping Wei, Michael Dambacher, Ming Yan, Xiaolin Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 395 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 14 | 4% |
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 354 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 16% |
| Researcher | 59 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 69 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 190 | 48% |
| Linguistics | 28 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,272,128
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,025
of 30,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,363
of 165,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#31
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.