↓ Skip to main content

Biology of Consciousness

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biology of Consciousness
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald M. Edelman, Joseph A. Gally, Bernard J. Baars

Abstract

The Dynamic Core and Global Workspace hypotheses were independently put forward to provide mechanistic and biologically plausible accounts of how brains generate conscious mental content. The Dynamic Core proposes that reentrant neural activity in the thalamocortical system gives rise to conscious experience. Global Workspace reconciles the limited capacity of momentary conscious content with the vast repertoire of long-term memory. In this paper we show the close relationship between the two hypotheses. This relationship allows for a strictly biological account of phenomenal experience and subjectivity that is consistent with mounting experimental evidence. We examine the constraints on causal analyses of consciousness and suggest that there is now sufficient evidence to consider the design and construction of a conscious artifact.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Germany 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 364 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 20%
Researcher 71 18%
Student > Master 61 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Professor 30 7%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 50 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 118 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 17%
Neuroscience 39 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 8%
Computer Science 19 5%
Other 70 17%
Unknown 59 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#611,484
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,258
of 34,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,589
of 193,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#14
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.