↓ Skip to main content

The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Mechanics of Embodiment: A Dialog on Embodiment and Computational Modeling
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Pezzulo, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Angelo Cangelosi, Martin H. Fischer, Ken McRae, Michael J. Spivey

Abstract

Embodied theories are increasingly challenging traditional views of cognition by arguing that conceptual representations that constitute our knowledge are grounded in sensory and motor experiences, and processed at this sensorimotor level, rather than being represented and processed abstractly in an amodal conceptual system. Given the established empirical foundation, and the relatively underspecified theories to date, many researchers are extremely interested in embodied cognition but are clamoring for more mechanistic implementations. What is needed at this stage is a push toward explicit computational models that implement sensorimotor grounding as intrinsic to cognitive processes. In this article, six authors from varying backgrounds and approaches address issues concerning the construction of embodied computational models, and illustrate what they view as the critical current and next steps toward mechanistic theories of embodiment. The first part has the form of a dialog between two fictional characters: Ernest, the "experimenter," and Mary, the "computational modeler." The dialog consists of an interactive sequence of questions, requests for clarification, challenges, and (tentative) answers, and touches the most important aspects of grounded theories that should inform computational modeling and, conversely, the impact that computational modeling could have on embodied theories. The second part of the article discusses the most important open challenges for embodied computational modeling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 5%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Italy 4 1%
Germany 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 315 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 27%
Researcher 59 16%
Student > Master 41 11%
Professor 26 7%
Student > Bachelor 26 7%
Other 81 22%
Unknown 35 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 133 36%
Computer Science 45 12%
Neuroscience 26 7%
Linguistics 19 5%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Other 76 21%
Unknown 50 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,038,425
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,966
of 29,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,033
of 180,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#47
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.