↓ Skip to main content

Gender Affects Body Language Reading

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender Affects Body Language Reading
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arseny A. Sokolov, Samuel Krüger, Paul Enck, Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann, Marina A. Pavlova

Abstract

Body motion is a rich source of information for social cognition. However, gender effects in body language reading are largely unknown. Here we investigated whether, and, if so, how recognition of emotional expressions revealed by body motion is gender dependent. To this end, females and males were presented with point-light displays portraying knocking at a door performed with different emotional expressions. The findings show that gender affects accuracy rather than speed of body language reading. This effect, however, is modulated by emotional content of actions: males surpass in recognition accuracy of happy actions, whereas females tend to excel in recognition of hostile angry knocking. Advantage of women in recognition accuracy of neutral actions suggests that females are better tuned to the lack of emotional content in body actions. The study provides novel insights into understanding of gender effects in body language reading, and helps to shed light on gender vulnerability to neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental impairments in visual social cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Hungary 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 115 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 31 25%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 29%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Arts and Humanities 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#736,210
of 25,400,630 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,512
of 34,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,112
of 190,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#17
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,400,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.