↓ Skip to main content

Numerical Rule-Learning in Ring-Tailed Lemurs (Lemur Catta)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Numerical Rule-Learning in Ring-Tailed Lemurs (Lemur Catta)
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dustin J. Merritt, Evan L. MacLean, Jeremy Chase Crawford, Elizabeth M. Brannon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 38 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 35%
Psychology 12 30%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,212,332
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,302
of 29,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,082
of 180,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#54
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.