↓ Skip to main content

Stress and Coping with Discrimination and Stigmatization

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stress and Coping with Discrimination and Stigmatization
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Berjot, Nicolas Gillet

Abstract

The aim of this article is to briefly review the literature on stigmatization and more generally identity threats, to focus more specifically of the way people appraise and cope with those threatening situations. Based on the transactional model of stress and coping of Lazarus and Folkman (1984), we propose a model of coping with identity threats that takes into accounts the principle characteristic of stigma, its devaluing aspect. We present a model with specific antecedents, a refined appraisal phase and a new classification of coping strategies based on the motives that may be elicited by the threatening situation, those of protecting and/or enhancing the personal and/or social identity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 449 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 13%
Student > Master 55 12%
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 7%
Student > Postgraduate 24 5%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 173 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 105 23%
Social Sciences 42 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 4%
Other 44 10%
Unknown 185 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#587,380
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,191
of 31,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,524
of 183,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#14
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.