You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interpersonal Synergies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael A. Riley, Michael J. Richardson, Kevin Shockley, Verónica C. Ramenzoni |
| Abstract |
We present the perspective that interpersonal movement coordination results from establishing interpersonal synergies. Interpersonal synergies are higher-order control systems formed by coupling movement system degrees of freedom of two (or more) actors. Characteristic features of synergies identified in studies of intrapersonal coordination - dimensional compression and reciprocal compensation - are revealed in studies of interpersonal coordination that applied the uncontrolled manifold approach and principal component analysis to interpersonal movement tasks. Broader implications of the interpersonal synergy approach for movement science include an expanded notion of mechanism and an emphasis on interaction-dominant dynamics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 344 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 22% |
| Researcher | 61 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 8% |
| Professor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 78 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 109 | 30% |
| Sports and Recreations | 49 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 20% |
| Unknown | 62 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,710,105
of 24,916,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,922
of 33,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,760
of 192,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#102
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,916,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.