You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alpha Rhythms in Audition: Cognitive and Clinical Perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00073 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathan Weisz, Thomas Hartmann, Nadia Müller, Isabel Lorenz, Jonas Obleser |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 340 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 24% |
| Researcher | 70 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 84 | 24% |
| Psychology | 80 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 8% |
| Engineering | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,120,836
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,753
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,245
of 197,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#160
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.