You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantifying the Time Course of Visual Object Processing Using ERPs: It's Time to Up the Game
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00107 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume A. Rousselet, Cyril R. Pernet |
| Abstract |
Hundreds of studies have investigated the early ERPs to faces and objects using scalp and intracranial recordings. The vast majority of these studies have used uncontrolled stimuli, inappropriate designs, peak measurements, poor figures, and poor inferential and descriptive group statistics. These problems, together with a tendency to discuss any effect p < 0.05 rather than to report effect sizes, have led to a research field very much qualitative in nature, despite its quantitative inspirations, and in which predictions do not go beyond condition A > condition B. Here we describe the main limitations of face and object ERP research and suggest alternative strategies to move forward. The problems plague intracranial and surface ERP studies, but also studies using more advanced techniques - e.g., source space analyses and measurements of network dynamics, as well as many behavioral, fMRI, TMS, and LFP studies. In essence, it is time to stop amassing binary results and start using single-trial analyses to build models of visual perception. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 34% |
| Researcher | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 86 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,126,914
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,170
of 34,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,859
of 194,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#115
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.