↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Practice and Experience on the Arcuate Fasciculus: Comparing Singers, Instrumentalists, and Non-Musicians

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Practice and Experience on the Arcuate Fasciculus: Comparing Singers, Instrumentalists, and Non-Musicians
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gus F. Halwani, Psyche Loui, Theodor Rüber, Gottfried Schlaug

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
France 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 273 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 24%
Student > Master 51 18%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 44 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 30%
Neuroscience 58 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 7%
Social Sciences 13 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 55 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,722,734
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,910
of 34,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,866
of 195,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#81
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.