↓ Skip to main content

Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Polymorphisms and Attachment in Human Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Polymorphisms and Attachment in Human Infants
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances S. Chen, Maria E. Barth, Stephen L. Johnson, Ian H. Gotlib, Susan C. Johnson

Abstract

Ordinary variations in human infants' attachment behaviors - their proclivity to seek and accept comfort from caregivers - are associated with a wide range of individual differences in psychological functioning in adults. The current investigation examined variation in the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene as one possible source of these variations in infant attachment. One hundred seventy-six infants (77 Caucasian, 99 non-Caucasian) were classified as securely or insecurely attached based on their behavior in the Strange Situation (Ainsworth et al., 1978). The A allele of OXTR rs2254298 was associated with attachment security in the non-Caucasian infants (p < 0.005). These findings underscore the importance of oxytocin in the development of human social behavior and support its role in social stress-regulation and the development of trust.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Hungary 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Austria 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 139 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 26%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 10 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,095,883
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,731
of 29,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,466
of 180,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#75
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.