↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition and Adjective Learning in Bilingual and Monolingual Children

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition and Adjective Learning in Bilingual and Monolingual Children
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanako Yoshida, Duc N. Tran, Viridiana Benitez, Megumi Kuwabara

Abstract

The ability to control attention - by inhibiting pre-potent, yet no longer relevant information - is an essential skill in all of human learning, and increasing evidence suggests that this ability is enhanced in language learning environments in which the learner is managing and using more than one language. One question waiting to be addressed is whether such efficient attentional control plays a role in word learning. That is, children who must manage two languages also must manage to learn two languages and the advantages of more efficient attentional control may benefit aspects of language learning within each language. This study compared bilingual and monolingual children's performances in an artificial word-learning task and in a non-linguistic task that measures attention control. Three-year-old monolingual and bilingual children with similar vocabulary development participated in these tasks. The results replicate earlier work showing advanced attentional control among bilingual children and suggest that this better attentional control may also benefit better performance in novel adjective learning. The findings provide the first direct evidence of a relation between performances in an artificial word-learning task and in an attentional control task. We discuss this finding with respect to the general relevance of attentional control for lexical learning in all children and with respect to current views of bilingual children's word learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 118 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 27%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 37%
Linguistics 19 15%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2011.
All research outputs
#6,060,516
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,643
of 29,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,766
of 180,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#104
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.