↓ Skip to main content

Auditory Stimulus Timing Influences Perceived duration of Co-Occurring Visual Stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Auditory Stimulus Timing Influences Perceived duration of Co-Occurring Visual Stimuli
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo Romei, Benjamin De Haas, Robert M. Mok, Jon Driver

Abstract

There is increasing interest in multisensory influences upon sensory-specific judgments, such as when auditory stimuli affect visual perception. Here we studied whether the duration of an auditory event can objectively affect the perceived duration of a co-occurring visual event. On each trial, participants were presented with a pair of successive flashes and had to judge whether the first or second was longer. Two beeps were presented with the flashes. The order of short and long stimuli could be the same across audition and vision (audio-visual congruent) or reversed, so that the longer flash was accompanied by the shorter beep and vice versa (audio-visual incongruent); or the two beeps could have the same duration as each other. Beeps and flashes could onset synchronously or asynchronously. In a further control experiment, the beep durations were much longer (tripled) than the flashes. Results showed that visual duration discrimination sensitivity (d') was significantly higher for congruent (and significantly lower for incongruent) audio-visual synchronous combinations, relative to the visual-only presentation. This effect was abolished when auditory and visual stimuli were presented asynchronously, or when sound durations tripled those of flashes. We conclude that the temporal properties of co-occurring auditory stimuli influence the perceived duration of visual stimuli and that this can reflect genuine changes in visual sensitivity rather than mere response bias.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 6%
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 92 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 45%
Neuroscience 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Computer Science 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,156,199
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#23,760
of 29,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,810
of 180,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#218
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.