↓ Skip to main content

Modulation of Cross-Frequency Coupling by Novel and Repeated Stimuli in the Primate Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modulation of Cross-Frequency Coupling by Novel and Repeated Stimuli in the Primate Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joji Tsunada, Allison E. Baker, Kate L. Christison-Lagay, Selina J. Davis, Yale E. Cohen

Abstract

Adaptive behavior depends on an animal's ability to ignore uninformative stimuli, such as repeated presentations of the same stimulus, and, instead, detect informative, novel stimuli in its environment. The primate prefrontal cortex (PFC) is known to play a central role in this ability. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the ability to differentiate between repeated and novel stimuli are not clear. We hypothesized that the coupling between different frequency bands of the local field potential (LFP) underlies the PFC's role in differentiating between repeated and novel stimuli. Specifically, we hypothesized that whereas the presentation of a novel-stimulus induces strong cross-frequency coupling, repeated presentations of the same stimulus attenuates this coupling. To test this hypothesis, we recorded LFPs from the ventrolateral PFC (vPFC) of rhesus monkeys while they listened to a novel vocalization and repeated presentations of the same vocalization. We found that the cross-frequency coupling between the gamma-band amplitude and theta-band phase of the LFP was modulated by repeated presentations of a stimulus. During the first (novel) presentation of a stimulus, gamma-band activity was modulated by the theta-band phase. However, with repeated presentations of the same stimulus, this cross-frequency coupling was attenuated. These results suggest that cross-frequency coupling may play a role in the neural computations that underlie the differentiation between novel and repeated stimuli in the vPFC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 11%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 57 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 28%
Neuroscience 13 20%
Psychology 8 12%
Computer Science 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,335,133
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#21,887
of 29,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,036
of 180,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#198
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.