↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainty and Cognitive Control

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uncertainty and Cognitive Control
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Faisal Mushtaq, Amy R. Bland, Alexandre Schaefer

Abstract

A growing trend of neuroimaging, behavioral, and computational research has investigated the topic of outcome uncertainty in decision-making. Although evidence to date indicates that humans are very effective in learning to adapt to uncertain situations, the nature of the specific cognitive processes involved in the adaptation to uncertainty are still a matter of debate. In this article, we reviewed evidence suggesting that cognitive control processes are at the heart of uncertainty in decision-making contexts. Available evidence suggests that: (1) There is a strong conceptual overlap between the constructs of uncertainty and cognitive control; (2) There is a remarkable overlap between the neural networks associated with uncertainty and the brain networks subserving cognitive control; (3) The perception and estimation of uncertainty might play a key role in monitoring processes and the evaluation of the "need for control"; (4) Potential interactions between uncertainty and cognitive control might play a significant role in several affective disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 312 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 22%
Researcher 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 11%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 57 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 150 46%
Neuroscience 27 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Computer Science 9 3%
Other 44 13%
Unknown 73 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,931,015
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,794
of 31,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,686
of 183,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#88
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.