↓ Skip to main content

Hemispheric Asymmetries: The Comparative View

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemispheric Asymmetries: The Comparative View
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Ocklenburg, Onur Güntürkün

Abstract

Hemispheric asymmetries play an important role in almost all cognitive functions. For more than a century, they were considered to be uniquely human but now an increasing number of findings in all vertebrate classes make it likely that we inherited our asymmetries from common ancestors. Thus, studying animal models could provide unique insights into the mechanisms of lateralization. We outline three such avenues of research by providing an overview of experiments on left-right differences in the connectivity of sensory systems, the embryonic determinants of brain asymmetries, and the genetics of lateralization. All these lines of studies could provide a wealth of insights into our own asymmetries that should and will be exploited by future analyses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 237 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 20%
Student > Master 48 20%
Researcher 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Professor 10 4%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 34 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 20%
Neuroscience 37 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 48 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,575,202
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,140
of 29,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,761
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#65
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.