↓ Skip to main content

Attention, Awareness, and the Perception of Auditory Scenes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attention, Awareness, and the Perception of Auditory Scenes
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joel S. Snyder, Melissa K. Gregg, David M. Weintraub, Claude Alain

Abstract

Auditory perception and cognition entails both low-level and high-level processes, which are likely to interact with each other to create our rich conscious experience of soundscapes. Recent research that we review has revealed numerous influences of high-level factors, such as attention, intention, and prior experience, on conscious auditory perception. And recently, studies have shown that auditory scene analysis tasks can exhibit multistability in a manner very similar to ambiguous visual stimuli, presenting a unique opportunity to study neural correlates of auditory awareness and the extent to which mechanisms of perception are shared across sensory modalities. Research has also led to a growing number of techniques through which auditory perception can be manipulated and even completely suppressed. Such findings have important consequences for our understanding of the mechanisms of perception and also should allow scientists to precisely distinguish the influences of different higher-level influences.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 236 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 28%
Researcher 53 21%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 93 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 11%
Neuroscience 27 11%
Engineering 16 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 44 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,006,448
of 24,077,033 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,676
of 32,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,421
of 250,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#200
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,077,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.