You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interpreting Deactivations in Neuroimaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dave J. Hayes, Adrianne G. Huxtable |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 29% |
| Researcher | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,961,254
of 25,027,753 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,727
of 33,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,707
of 255,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#93
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,027,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.