↓ Skip to main content

Linguistically Modulated Perception and Cognition: The Label-Feedback Hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
359 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linguistically Modulated Perception and Cognition: The Label-Feedback Hypothesis
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary Lupyan

Abstract

How does language impact cognition and perception? A growing number of studies show that language, and specifically the practice of labeling, can exert extremely rapid and pervasive effects on putatively non-verbal processes such as categorization, visual discrimination, and even simply detecting the presence of a stimulus. Progress on the empirical front, however, has not been accompanied by progress in understanding the mechanisms by which language affects these processes. One puzzle is how effects of language can be both deep, in the sense of affecting even basic visual processes, and yet vulnerable to manipulations such as verbal interference, which can sometimes nullify effects of language. In this paper, I review some of the evidence for effects of language on cognition and perception, showing that performance on tasks that have been presumed to be non-verbal is rapidly modulated by language. I argue that a clearer understanding of the relationship between language and cognition can be achieved by rejecting the distinction between verbal and non-verbal representations and by adopting a framework in which language modulates ongoing cognitive and perceptual processing in a flexible and task-dependent manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Germany 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 335 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 24%
Student > Master 52 15%
Researcher 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 6%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 53 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 168 47%
Linguistics 41 11%
Neuroscience 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Philosophy 12 3%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 62 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,184,790
of 25,808,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,495
of 34,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,168
of 252,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#41
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,808,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.