You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping Symbols to Sounds: Electrophysiological Correlates of the Impaired Reading Process in Dyslexia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andreas Widmann, Erich Schröger, Mari Tervaniemi, Satu Pakarinen, Teija Kujala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 106 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2020.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,300
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,563
of 255,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#255
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.