↓ Skip to main content

Integration or Predictability? A Further Specification of the Functional Role of Gamma Oscillations in Language Comprehension

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integration or Predictability? A Further Specification of the Functional Role of Gamma Oscillations in Language Comprehension
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Wang, Zude Zhu, Marcel Bastiaansen

Abstract

Gamma-band neuronal synchronization during sentence-level language comprehension has previously been linked with semantic unification. Here, we attempt to further narrow down the functional significance of gamma during language comprehension, by distinguishing between two aspects of semantic unification: successful integration of word meaning into the sentence context, and prediction of upcoming words. We computed event-related potentials (ERPs) and frequency band-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) power changes while participants read sentences that contained a critical word (CW) that was (1) both semantically congruent and predictable (high cloze, HC), (2) semantically congruent but unpredictable (low cloze, LC), or (3) semantically incongruent (and therefore also unpredictable; semantic violation, SV). The ERP analysis showed the expected parametric N400 modulation (HC < LC < SV). The time-frequency analysis showed qualitatively different results. In the gamma-frequency range, we observed a power increase in response to the CW in the HC condition, but not in the LC and the SV conditions. Additionally, in the theta frequency range we observed a power increase in the SV condition only. Our data provide evidence that gamma power increases are related to the predictability of an upcoming word based on the preceding sentence context, rather than to the integration of the incoming word's semantics into the preceding context. Further, our theta band data are compatible with the notion that theta band synchronization in sentence comprehension might be related to the detection of an error in the language input.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 136 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 31%
Researcher 27 18%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 31%
Neuroscience 30 20%
Linguistics 21 14%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#3,175,587
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,855
of 29,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,473
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#104
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.