You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Task-Dependent Modulation of Effective Connectivity within the Default Mode Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00206 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baojuan Li, Xiang Wang, Shuqiao Yao, Dewen Hu, Karl Friston |
| Abstract |
The default mode network (DMN) has recently attracted widespread interest. Previous studies have found that task-related processing can induce deactivation and changes in the functional connectivity of this network. However, it remains unclear how tasks modulate the underlying effective connectivity within the DMN. Using recent advances in dynamic causal modeling (DCM), we investigated the modulatory effect of (gender judgment) task performance on directed connectivity within the DMN. Sixteen healthy subjects were scanned twice: at rest and while performing a gender judgment task. Group independent component analysis was used to identify independent spatial components. Four subject-specific regions of interest (ROIs) were defined according to the ensuing default mode component: the posterior cingulate cortex, the left lateral parietal cortex, the right lateral parietal cortex, and the medial prefrontal cortex. Effective connectivity among these regions was then characterized with stochastic DCM, revealing enhanced (extrinsic) between region connectivity within the DMN during task sessions - and a universal decrease in (intrinsic) self-inhibition - relative to resting sessions. These results suggest a distributed but systematic modulatory effect of cognitive and attentional set on the effective connectivity subtending the DMN: an effect that increases its sensitivity to inputs and may optimize distributed processing during task performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Researcher | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 30 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2012.
All research outputs
#19,631,015
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#24,116
of 32,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,205
of 251,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#380
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.