You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Training Visual Imagery: Improvements of Metacognition, but not Imagery Strength
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosanne L. Rademaker, Joel Pearson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 48 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2023.
All research outputs
#13,644,834
of 24,336,902 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,172
of 32,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,912
of 251,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#208
of 480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,336,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.