↓ Skip to main content

From Emotions to Consciousness – A Neuro-Phenomenal and Neuro-Relational Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Emotions to Consciousness – A Neuro-Phenomenal and Neuro-Relational Approach
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georg Northoff

Abstract

The James-Lange theory considers emotional feelings as perceptions of physiological body changes. This approach has recently resurfaced and modified in both neuroscientific and philosophical concepts of embodiment of emotional feelings. In addition to the body, the role of the environment in emotional feeling needs to be considered. I here claim that the environment has not merely an indirect and instrumental, i.e., modulatory role on emotional feelings via the body and its sensorimotor and vegetative functions. Instead, the environment may have a direct and non-instrumental, i.e., constitutional role in emotional feelings. This implies that the environment itself is constitutive of emotional feeling rather than the bodily representation of the environment. I call this the relational concept of emotional feeling. The present paper discusses recent data from neuroimaging that investigate emotions in relation to interoceptive processing and the brain's intrinsic activity. These data show the intrinsic linkage of interoceptive stimulus processing to both exteroceptive stimuli and the brain's intrinsic activity. This is possible only if the differences between intrinsic activity and intero- and exteroceptive stimuli is encoded into neural activity. Such relational coding makes possible the assignment of subjective and affective features to the otherwise objective and non-affective stimulus. I therefore consider emotions to be intrinsically affective and subjective as it is manifest in emotional feelings. The relational approach thus goes together with what may be described as neuro-phenomenal approach. Such neuro-phenomenal approach does not only inform emotions and emotional feeling but is also highly relevant to better understand the neuronal mechanisms underlying consciousness in general.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 154 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 40 24%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 28%
Neuroscience 26 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,547,194
of 23,920,246 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,121
of 31,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,000
of 249,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#64
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,920,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.