↓ Skip to main content

Do Horses Expect Humans to Solve Their Problems?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Horses Expect Humans to Solve Their Problems?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00306
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Lesimple, C. Sankey, M. A. Richard, M. Hausberger

Abstract

Domestic animals are highly capable of detecting human cues, while wild relatives tend to perform less well (e.g., responding to pointing gestures). It is suggested that domestication may have led to the development of such cognitive skills. Here, we hypothesized that because domestic animals are so attentive and dependant to humans' actions for resources, the counter effect may be a decline of self sufficiency, such as individual task solving. Here we show a negative correlation between the performance in a learning task (opening a chest) and the interest shown by horses toward humans, despite high motivation expressed by investigative behaviors directed at the chest. If human-directed attention reflects the development of particular skills in domestic animals, this is to our knowledge the first study highlighting a link between human-directed behaviors and impaired individual solving task skills (ability to solve a task by themselves) in horses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 10 15%
Professor 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 38%
Psychology 18 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2012.
All research outputs
#2,547,738
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,842
of 29,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,645
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#89
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.