↓ Skip to main content

A Transformative Subfield in Rehabilitation Science at the Nexus of New Technologies, Aging, and Disability

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Transformative Subfield in Rehabilitation Science at the Nexus of New Technologies, Aging, and Disability
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00340
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolee J. Winstein, Philip S. Requejo, Elizabeth M. Zelinski, Sara J. Mulroy, Eileen M. Crimmins

Abstract

We argue that a silo research and training approach is no longer sufficient to provide real solutions to the complex humanitarian, social, and financial problems brought about by global trends in aging and the increased prevalence of multiple chronic conditions that limit independence and activities of daily living. This perspective highlights the opportunities for collaborative research and training in a new multidisciplinary science of rehabilitation enabled by growing knowledge and information along scientifically and clinically meaningful lines. The recent proliferation of eHealth technologies offers opportunities for development of low-cost, simple, interactive media prevention, health maintenance, and continued functional recovery programs using a chronic care model designed to promote engagement and participation. With two examples - long-term disability consequential to (1) hip fracture and (2) manual wheelchair use - we outline the developing science for a collaborative and transformative nexus team capable of accelerating an understanding of ways to restore independence and improve quality of life, in the long-term. We conclude with a set of recommendations for the design of interactive media systems to both increase acceptability and stimulate research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Student > Master 16 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Social Sciences 11 9%
Engineering 8 6%
Psychology 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,720,263
of 24,187,594 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,471
of 32,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,308
of 251,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#68
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.