You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In Support of a Distinction between Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Control: A Review of the Literature on Proportion Congruent Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie M. Bugg, Matthew J. C. Crump |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 16% |
| Researcher | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 143 | 61% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2012.
All research outputs
#16,999,224
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,286
of 34,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,732
of 251,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#282
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.