↓ Skip to main content

Motivation Matters: Differing Effects of Pre-Goal and Post-Goal Emotions on Attention and Memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivation Matters: Differing Effects of Pre-Goal and Post-Goal Emotions on Attention and Memory
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin L. Kaplan, Ilse Van Damme, Linda J. Levine

Abstract

People often show enhanced memory for information that is central to emotional events and impaired memory for peripheral details. The intensity of arousal elicited by an emotional event is commonly held to be the mechanism underlying memory narrowing, with the implication that all sources of emotional arousal should have comparable effects. Discrete emotions differ in their effects on memory, however, with some emotions broadening rather than narrowing the range of information attended to and remembered. Thus, features of emotion other than arousal appear to play a critical role in memory narrowing. We review theory and research on emotional memory narrowing and argue that motivation matters. Recent evidence suggests that emotions experienced prior to goal attainment or loss lead to memory narrowing whereas emotions experienced after goal attainment or loss broaden the range of information encoded in memory. The motivational component of emotion is an important but understudied feature that can help to clarify the conditions under which emotions enhance and impair attention and memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 54%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,057,573
of 24,993,752 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,145
of 33,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,487
of 255,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#161
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,993,752 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.