↓ Skip to main content

Neural Correlates of Switching Attentional Focus during Finger Movements: An fMRI Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Correlates of Switching Attentional Focus during Finger Movements: An fMRI Study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin M. Zimmermann, Matthias Bischoff, Britta Lorey, Rudolf Stark, Jörn Munzert, Karen Zentgraf

Abstract

Research on motor-related attentional foci suggests that switching from an internal to an external focus of attention has advantageous effects on motor performance whereas switching from an external to an internal focus has disadvantageous effects. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the neural correlates of switching the focus of attention. Two experimental groups were trained to apply one focus direction - internal or external - on a previously learned finger tapping sequence. Participants with an internal focus training were instructed to attend to their moving fingers; those with an external focus training were instructed to attend to the response buttons. In the first half of the experiment, participants performed with their trained focus, in the second half, they were unexpectedly asked to switch to the untrained attentional focus. Our data showed that the switch from a trained internal to an unfamiliar external focus of attention elicited increased activation of the left lateral premotor cortex (PMC). We propose that this activation can be linked to the role of the PMC in action planning - probably indicating a facilitation effect on selectional motor processes. Switching from a trained external to an unfamiliar internal focus of attention revealed enhanced activation of the left primary somatosensory cortex and intraparietal lobule. We interpret these modulations as a result of the amplifying influence of afferent information on motor processing when asked to attend internally in a motor task after being trained with an external focus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 78 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 24%
Neuroscience 13 16%
Sports and Recreations 12 15%
Engineering 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 10 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,817,167
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,925
of 34,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,332
of 252,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#243
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.