You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00559 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel W. Piepers, Rachel A. Robbins |
| Abstract |
It is widely agreed that the human face is processed differently from other objects. However there is a lack of consensus on what is meant by a wide array of terms used to describe this "special" face processing (e.g., holistic and configural) and the perceptually relevant information within a face (e.g., relational properties and configuration). This paper will review existing models of holistic/configural processing, discuss how they differ from one another conceptually, and review the wide variety of measures used to tap into these concepts. In general we favor a model where holistic processing of a face includes some or all of the interrelations between features and has separate coding for features. However, some aspects of the model remain unclear. We propose the use of moving faces as a way of clarifying what types of information are included in the holistic representation of a face. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 169 | 57% |
| Neuroscience | 32 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,638,640
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,054
of 31,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,695
of 247,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#193
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.