↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Learning Across Development: Flexible Yet Constrained

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical Learning Across Development: Flexible Yet Constrained
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00598
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Krogh, Haley A. Vlach, Scott P. Johnson

Abstract

Much research in the past two decades has documented infants' and adults' ability to extract statistical regularities from auditory input. Importantly, recent research has extended these findings to the visual domain, demonstrating learners' sensitivity to statistical patterns within visual arrays and sequences of shapes. In this review we discuss both auditory and visual statistical learning to elucidate both the generality of and constraints on statistical learning. The review first outlines the major findings of the statistical learning literature with infants, followed by discussion of statistical learning across domains, modalities, and development. The second part of this review considers constraints on statistical learning. The discussion focuses on two categories of constraint: constraints on the types of input over which statistical learning operates and constraints based on the state of the learner. The review concludes with a discussion of possible mechanisms underlying statistical learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 235 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 30%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 32 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 115 48%
Linguistics 25 10%
Neuroscience 19 8%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 51 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,332,207
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,718
of 31,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,584
of 284,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#648
of 968 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 968 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.