↓ Skip to main content

Life Stress Impairs Self-Control in Early Adolescence

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Life Stress Impairs Self-Control in Early Adolescence
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00608
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela L. Duckworth, Betty Kim, Eli Tsukayama

Abstract

The importance of self-control to a wide range of developmental outcomes prompted the current investigation of negative life events and self-control in early adolescence. In three prospective, longitudinal studies, negative life events reported by the mother (in Study 1) or child (in Studies 2 and 3) predicted rank-order decreases in self-control over time. In all studies, self-control was measured at two different time points using questionnaires completed by three separate raters, including a classroom teacher who knew the child well and two other raters (parents, caregivers, and/or the child himself/herself). Psychological distress measured in Studies 2 and 3 mediated the deleterious effects of negative life events on self-control. These findings extend prior experimental laboratory research documenting the acute effects of stress on self-control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 172 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 74 41%
Social Sciences 27 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 43 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2022.
All research outputs
#949,469
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,955
of 31,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,255
of 283,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#98
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.