↓ Skip to main content

Computational Grounded Cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
316 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational Grounded Cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Pezzulo, Lawrence W. Barsalou, Angelo Cangelosi, Martin H. Fischer, Ken McRae, Michael J. Spivey

Abstract

Grounded theories assume that there is no central module for cognition. According to this view, all cognitive phenomena, including those considered the province of amodal cognition such as reasoning, numeric, and language processing, are ultimately grounded in (and emerge from) a variety of bodily, affective, perceptual, and motor processes. The development and expression of cognition is constrained by the embodiment of cognitive agents and various contextual factors (physical and social) in which they are immersed. The grounded framework has received numerous empirical confirmations. Still, there are very few explicit computational models that implement grounding in sensory, motor and affective processes as intrinsic to cognition, and demonstrate that grounded theories can mechanistically implement higher cognitive abilities. We propose a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling toward a novel multidisciplinary enterprise: Computational Grounded Cognition. We clarify the defining features of this novel approach and emphasize the importance of using the methodology of Cognitive Robotics, which permits simultaneous consideration of multiple aspects of grounding, embodiment, and situatedness, showing how they constrain the development and expression of cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
France 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 285 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 23%
Researcher 65 21%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Student > Master 28 9%
Professor 21 7%
Other 68 22%
Unknown 31 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 101 32%
Computer Science 55 17%
Linguistics 20 6%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Neuroscience 14 4%
Other 60 19%
Unknown 47 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,156,185
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,648
of 33,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,430
of 293,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#444
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.