↓ Skip to main content

Attribution of Intentional Causation Influences the Perception of Observed Movements: Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attribution of Intentional Causation Influences the Perception of Observed Movements: Behavioral Evidence and Neural Correlates
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00023
Pubmed ID
Authors

James W. Moore, Christoph Teufel, Naresh Subramaniam, Greg Davis, Paul C. Fletcher

Abstract

Recent research on human agency suggests that intentional causation is associated with a subjective compression in the temporal interval between actions and their effects. That is, intentional movements and their causal effects are perceived as closer together in time than equivalent unintentional movements and their causal effects. This so-called intentional binding effect is consistently found for one's own self-generated actions. It has also been suggested that intentional binding occurs when observing intentional movements of others. However, this evidence is undermined by limitations of the paradigm used. In the current study we aimed to overcome these limitations using a more rigorous design in combination with functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) to explore the neural underpinnings of intentional binding of observed movements. In particular, we aimed to identify brain areas sensitive to the interaction between intentionality and causality attributed to the observed action. Our behavioral results confirmed the occurrence of intentional binding for observed movements using this more rigorous paradigm. Our fMRI results highlighted a collection of brain regions whose activity was sensitive to the interaction between intentionality and causation. Intriguingly, these brain regions have previously been implicated in the sense of agency over one's own movements. We discuss the implications of these results for intentional binding specifically, and the sense of agency more generally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 4%
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 30%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 50%
Neuroscience 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,743,944
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,987
of 29,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,237
of 280,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#651
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.