↓ Skip to main content

Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in Elite Volleyball Players

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
97 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise in Elite Volleyball Players
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heloisa Alves, Michelle W. Voss, Walter R. Boot, Andrea Deslandes, Victor Cossich, Jose Inacio Salles, Arthur F. Kramer

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to investigate the relationship between sport expertise and perceptual and cognitive skills, as measured by the component skills approach. We hypothesized that athletes would outperform non-athlete controls in a number of perceptual and cognitive domains and that sport expertise would minimize gender differences. A total of 154 individuals (87 professional volleyball players and 67 non-athlete controls) participated in the study. Participants performed a cognitive battery, which included tests of executive control, memory, and visuo-spatial attention. Athletes showed superior performance speed on three tasks (two executive control tasks and one visuo-spatial attentional processing task). In a subset of tasks, gender effects were observed mainly in the control group, supporting the notion that athletic experience can reduce traditional gender effects. The expertise effects obtained substantiate the view that laboratory tests of cognition may indeed enlighten the sport-cognition relationship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Libya 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 240 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Researcher 13 5%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 71 28%
Psychology 55 22%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 6%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 60 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#340,062
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#695
of 34,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,230
of 290,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#35
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.