↓ Skip to main content

Motivation Modulates Visual Attention: Evidence from Pupillometry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivation Modulates Visual Attention: Evidence from Pupillometry
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnieszka Wykowska, Christine Anderl, Anna Schubö, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that action planning does not only affect the preparation and execution of overt actions but also "works back" to tune the perceptual system toward action-relevant information. We investigated whether the amount of this impact of action planning on perceptual selection varies as a function of motivation for action, which was assessed online by means of pupillometry (Experiment 1) and visual analog scales (VAS, Experiment 2). Findings replicate the earlier observation that searching for size-defined targets is more efficient in the context of grasping than in the context of pointing movements (Wykowska et al., 2009). As expected, changes in tonic pupil size (reflecting changes in effort and motivation) across the sessions, as well as changes in motivation-related scores on the VAS were found to correlate with changes in the size of the action-perception congruency effect. We conclude that motivation and effort might play a crucial role in how much participants prepare for an action and activate action codes. The degree of activation of action codes in turn influences the observed action-related biases on perception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 83 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 45%
Neuroscience 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 11 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,424,121
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,858
of 29,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,153
of 280,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#481
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.