↓ Skip to main content

The Emergence of Hierarchical Structure in Human Language

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
48 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Emergence of Hierarchical Structure in Human Language
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shigeru Miyagawa, Robert C. Berwick, Kazuo Okanoya

Abstract

We propose a novel account for the emergence of human language syntax. Like many evolutionary innovations, language arose from the adventitious combination of two pre-existing, simpler systems that had been evolved for other functional tasks. The first system, Type E(xpression), is found in birdsong, where the same song marks territory, mating availability, and similar "expressive" functions. The second system, Type L(exical), has been suggestively found in non-human primate calls and in honeybee waggle dances, where it demarcates predicates with one or more "arguments," such as combinations of calls in monkeys or compass headings set to sun position in honeybees. We show that human language syntax is composed of two layers that parallel these two independently evolved systems: an "E" layer resembling the Type E system of birdsong and an "L" layer providing words. The existence of the "E" and "L" layers can be confirmed using standard linguistic methodology. Each layer, E and L, when considered separately, is characterizable as a finite state system, as observed in several non-human species. When the two systems are put together they interact, yielding the unbounded, non-finite state, hierarchical structure that serves as the hallmark of full-fledged human language syntax. In this way, we account for the appearance of a novel function, language, within a conventional Darwinian framework, along with its apparently unique emergence in a single species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
United Kingdom 4 2%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 206 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 22%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 29 13%
Professor 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 26 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 48 21%
Psychology 38 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 15%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Computer Science 10 4%
Other 55 24%
Unknown 27 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#346,141
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#706
of 34,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,282
of 290,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#36
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.