↓ Skip to main content

Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
448 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randall C. O’Reilly, Dean Wyatte, Seth Herd, Brian Mingus, David J. Jilk

Abstract

How does the brain learn to recognize objects visually, and perform this difficult feat robustly in the face of many sources of ambiguity and variability? We present a computational model based on the biology of the relevant visual pathways that learns to reliably recognize 100 different object categories in the face of naturally occurring variability in location, rotation, size, and lighting. The model exhibits robustness to highly ambiguous, partially occluded inputs. Both the unified, biologically plausible learning mechanism and the robustness to occlusion derive from the role that recurrent connectivity and recurrent processing mechanisms play in the model. Furthermore, this interaction of recurrent connectivity and learning predicts that high-level visual representations should be shaped by error signals from nearby, associated brain areas over the course of visual learning. Consistent with this prediction, we show how semantic knowledge about object categories changes the nature of their learned visual representations, as well as how this representational shift supports the mapping between perceptual and conceptual knowledge. Altogether, these findings support the potential importance of ongoing recurrent processing throughout the brain's visual system and suggest ways in which object recognition can be understood in terms of interactions within and between processes over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Germany 6 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 423 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 26%
Student > Master 81 18%
Researcher 63 14%
Student > Bachelor 56 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 6%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 39 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 158 35%
Engineering 71 16%
Psychology 68 15%
Neuroscience 47 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 5%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 49 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,148,931
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,427
of 29,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,731
of 280,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#533
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.