↓ Skip to main content

Remembering New Words: Integrating Early Memory Development into Word Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remembering New Words: Integrating Early Memory Development into Word Learning
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erica H. Wojcik

Abstract

In order to successfully acquire a new word, young children must learn the correct associations between labels and their referents. For decades, word-learning researchers have explored how young children are able to form these associations. However, in addition to learning label-referent mappings, children must also remember them. Despite the importance of memory processes in forming a stable lexicon, there has been little integration of early memory research into the study of early word learning. After discussing what we know about how young children remember words over time, this paper reviews the infant memory development literature as it relates to early word learning, focusing on changes in retention duration, encoding, consolidation, and retrieval across the first 2 years of life. A third section applies this review to word learning and presents future directions, arguing that the integration of memory processes into the study of word learning will provide researchers with novel, useful insights into how young children acquire new words.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Russia 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 139 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 26%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Professor 14 9%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 46%
Linguistics 20 13%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#12,813,078
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,679
of 29,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,095
of 280,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#510
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.