↓ Skip to main content

Sensory Attenuation for Jointly Produced Action Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sensory Attenuation for Jointly Produced Action Effects
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00172
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janeen D. Loehr

Abstract

Successful joint action often requires people to distinguish between their own and others' contributions to a shared goal. One mechanism that is thought to underlie a self-other distinction is sensory attenuation, whereby the sensory consequences of one's own actions are reduced compared to other sensory events. Previous research has shown that the auditory N1 event-related potential (ERP) response is reduced for self-generated compared to externally generated tones. The current study examined whether attenuation also occurs for jointly generated tones, which require two people to coordinate their actions to produce a single tone. ERP responses were measured when participants generated tones alone (tone onset immediately followed the participant's button press) or with a partner (tone onset immediately followed the participant's or the partner's button press, whichever occurred second). N1 attenuation was smaller for jointly generated tones compared to self-generated tones. For jointly generated tones, greater delays between the participant's and the partner's button presses were associated with reduced attenuation; moreover, only trials in which there was no delay between the participant's press and tone onset showed attenuation, whereas trials in which there were delays did not show attenuation. These findings indicate that people differentiate between their own and another person's contributions to a joint action at the sensorimotor level, even when they must act together to produce a single, shared effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Israel 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 62 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 51%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Engineering 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,684,990
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#20,213
of 29,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,155
of 280,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#756
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.