↓ Skip to main content

Xenomelia: A Social Neuroscience View of Altered Bodily Self-Consciousness

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
29 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Xenomelia: A Social Neuroscience View of Altered Bodily Self-Consciousness
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00204
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Brugger, Bigna Lenggenhager, Melita J. Giummarra

Abstract

Xenomelia, the "foreign limb syndrome," is characterized by the non-acceptance of one or more of one's own extremities and the resulting desire for elective limb amputation or paralysis. Formerly labeled "body integrity identity disorder" (BIID), the condition was originally considered a psychological or psychiatric disorder, but a brain-centered Zeitgeist and a rapidly growing interest in the neural underpinnings of bodily self-consciousness has shifted the focus toward dysfunctional central nervous system circuits. The present article outlays both mind-based and brain-based views highlighting their shortcomings. We propose that full insight into what should be conceived a "xenomelia spectrum disorder" will require interpretation of individual symptomatology in a social context. A proper social neuroscience of xenomelia respects the functional neuroanatomy of corporeal awareness, but also acknowledges the brain's plasticity in response to an individual's history, which is lived against a cultural background. This integrated view of xenomelia will promote the subfield of consciousness research concerned with the unity of body and self.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 114 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 20%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 36 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Neuroscience 17 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Philosophy 4 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#807,785
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,672
of 34,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,144
of 293,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#83
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.