↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Embodiment in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Review of Embodiment in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00224
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inge-Marie Eigsti

Abstract

In classical approaches to cognition, sensory, motor, and emotional experiences are stripped of domain-specific perceptual and sensorimotor information, and represented in a relatively abstract form. In contrast, the embodied cognition framework suggests that our representations retain the initial imprint of the manner in which information was acquired. In this paper, we argue that individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) display impairments in the temporal coordination of motor and conceptual information (as shown in gesture research) and striking deficits in the interpersonal mimicry of motor behaviors (as shown in yawning research) - findings we believe are consistent with an embodied account of ASD that includes, but goes beyond, social experiences and is driven in part by significant but subtle motor deficits. In this paper, we review the research examining an embodied cognition account of ASD, and discuss its implications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 206 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 40%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Neuroscience 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 5%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,715,487
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,669
of 31,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,082
of 283,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#342
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.