↓ Skip to main content

Deep Unsupervised Learning on a Desktop PC: A Primer for Cognitive Scientists

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep Unsupervised Learning on a Desktop PC: A Primer for Cognitive Scientists
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto Testolin, Ivilin Stoianov, Michele De Filippo De Grazia, Marco Zorzi

Abstract

Deep belief networks hold great promise for the simulation of human cognition because they show how structured and abstract representations may emerge from probabilistic unsupervised learning. These networks build a hierarchy of progressively more complex distributed representations of the sensory data by fitting a hierarchical generative model. However, learning in deep networks typically requires big datasets and it can involve millions of connection weights, which implies that simulations on standard computers are unfeasible. Developing realistic, medium-to-large-scale learning models of cognition would therefore seem to require expertise in programing parallel-computing hardware, and this might explain why the use of this promising approach is still largely confined to the machine learning community. Here we show how simulations of deep unsupervised learning can be easily performed on a desktop PC by exploiting the processors of low cost graphic cards (graphic processor units) without any specific programing effort, thanks to the use of high-level programming routines (available in MATLAB or Python). We also show that even an entry-level graphic card can outperform a small high-performance computing cluster in terms of learning time and with no loss of learning quality. We therefore conclude that graphic card implementations pave the way for a widespread use of deep learning among cognitive scientists for modeling cognition and behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Italy 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 132 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 22%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 8 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 23%
Computer Science 33 23%
Engineering 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,421,856
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,735
of 31,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,960
of 284,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#233
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.