↓ Skip to main content

Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan W. de Fockert

Abstract

The perceptual load and dilution models differ fundamentally in terms of the proposed mechanism underlying variation in distractibility during different perceptual conditions. However, both models predict that distracting information can be processed beyond perceptual processing under certain conditions, a prediction that is well-supported by the literature. Load theory proposes that in such cases, where perceptual task aspects do not allow for sufficient attentional selectivity, the maintenance of task-relevant processing depends on cognitive control mechanisms, including working memory. The key prediction is that working memory plays a role in keeping clear processing priorities in the face of potential distraction, and the evidence reviewed and evaluated in a meta-analysis here supports this claim, by showing that the processing of distracting information tends to be enhanced when load on a concurrent task of working memory is high. Low working memory capacity is similarly associated with greater distractor processing in selective attention, again suggesting that the unavailability of working memory during selective attention leads to an increase in distractibility. Together, these findings suggest that selective attention against distractors that are processed beyond perception depends on the availability of working memory. Possible mechanisms for the effects of working memory on selective attention are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Cyprus 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 178 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 25%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 102 54%
Neuroscience 17 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 31 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#461,315
of 22,710,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#924
of 29,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,537
of 280,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#61
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,710,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.